Cases 1 - 10 of 29
MOORE v. SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.
as 3:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MOORE
Defendant:
SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Scott v. Lavender Lingerie et al
as 1:2023cv04731
Plaintiff:
Kimberly R. Scott
Defendant:
Lavender Lingerie doing business as Savage X Fenty, Shoe Carnival, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe Global, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Shoe Carnival, Inc.
as 1:2022cv06813
Plaintiff:
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC
Defendant:
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Poulston v. Shoe Carnival, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00695
Plaintiff:
Juanita Poulston
Defendant:
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 American With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Hasty et al v. Shoe Carnival, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Derek Hasty and Daniel Mcelveen
Defendant:
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
309 VENTURE PARTNERS v. SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.
as 2:2021cv05392
Plaintiff:
309 VENTURE PARTNERS
Defendant:
SHOE CARNIVAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
