Cases 51 - 60 of 1,019
Sistos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2018cv00077
Petitioner:
Rex Sistos
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Del Rio v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv04268
Plaintiff:
Sisto Del Rio, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Abreu v. Travers
as 17-2981
Appellee:
Fischer, DOCCS Commissioner, Rock, Superintendent, D. Bilow, Correction Officer and others
Defendant:
White, Inmate Grievance Supervisor, Rabideau, Nurse Administrator 2, R. Isobella, Lt. and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Rizzo v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv05313
Defendant:
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., Chih-Hsiang (Thompson) Lin and Stefan J. Murry
Movant:
Philip R. Deubler, Jr., Lawrence Rougier and Daniel Sisto
Plaintiff:
Gianluca Rizzo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Beckel et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04247
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Beckel and Allen M Barnard
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Erik Kunkle, C Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rougier v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02399
Defendant:
Stefan J. Murry, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. and Chih-Hsiang Thompson Lin
Plaintiff:
Mona Abouzied, Kristen Knight, Mark Naglich and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Chad Ludwig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Delfino Sisto
as 17-50405
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DELFINO JESUS SISTOS
Charles Reece v. D. Sisto, et al
as 17-15247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GREGORY REECE
Defendant - Appellee:
D. K. SISTO, Warden and DON MIMIS, Plant Opreation
Vester Patterson v. USDC-CALA
as 16-73732
:
In re: VESTER L. PATTERSON
Petitioner:
VESTER L. PATTERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
D. K. SISTO, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
