Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Heather Picquelle v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Heather Picquelle
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, GRFLISE, Xin Xiu Lai and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
SMALS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17555
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMALS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMALS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv01934
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NESSMITH et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03077
Plaintiff:
JAMES BOWLES, ALLAN EUROZA, DANIEL YOON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nessmith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02081
Plaintiff:
James Bowles, Allan Euroza, Daniel Yoon and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Tilson v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Sonya Randall Edwards, Bradford Barker, Donna Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Tilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maureen Hay, et al v. American Safety Indemnity Comp
as 17-35818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAUREEN HAY, a Washington resident, IGOR SMAL, a Washington resident, HANNA SMAL, a Washington resident and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN SAFETY INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign insurer
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Maureen Hay , Igor Smal , Hanna Smal and others
Defendant:
American Safety Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hay et al v. American Safety Indemnity Company
as 3:2017cv05077
Plaintiff:
Maureen Hay , Igor Smal , Hanna Smal and others
Defendant:
American Safety Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
