Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Crocker v. Smith County Sheriff's Office
as 6:2026cv00336
Plaintiff:
Johnny Crocker
Defendant:
Smith County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kohute v. Smith County Jail
as 3:2026cv01730
Petitioner:
Kevin James Kohute
Respondent:
Smith County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Kohute v. Sheriff, Smith County Jail
as 6:2026cv00246
Petitioner:
Kevin J. Kohute
Respondent:
Sheriff, Smith County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkinson v. Smith County
as 26-40305
Plaintiff:
Gary Wilkinson, by and through his appointed Guardian Ad Litem, Michael Wilkinson
Defendant:
Smith County, Texas
Kohute v. Warden, Smith County Jail (Out of State)
as 6:2026cv01098
Petitioner:
Kevin J. Kohute
Respondent:
Warden, Smith County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kohute v. Smith County Coroner Records
as 6:2026cv00226
Petitioner:
Kevin James Kohute
Respondent:
Smith County Coroner Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Smith County Sheriff Department
as 6:2026cv00195
Defendant:
Smith County Sheriff Department, Officer FNU Youngblood and Officer FNU Hernandez
Plaintiff:
Eulices Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Phelps v. State of Kansas, et al
as 26-3084
Plaintiff:
SHAWN BURKE PHELPS
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, SMITH COUNTY, KANSAS, CITY OF SMITH CENTER, KANSAS and others
Kohute v. Smith County Coroner Records
as 4:2026cv03431
Petitioner:
Kevin James Kohute
Respondent:
Smith County Coroner Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Clay v. Rodgers
as 6:2026cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jahmal Clay
Defendant:
Officer K (FNU) Rodgers, Smith County Jail and Unknown Schoolfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
