Cases 21 - 30 of 57
VAUGHN v. GILL et al
as 2:2017cv00546
Plaintiff:
AARON VAUGHN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILL, S.C .I. GREENE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILL AND HIS CO-WORKERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sokol v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv00361
Plaintiff:
Karen Lynn Sokol
Defendant:
Minnesota Life Insurance Company and Securian Financial Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOGLE v. SOKOL et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
LEWIS JAMES FOGLE
Defendant:
JOHN SOKOL, MICHAEL STEFFEE, DONALD BECHWITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ABD-ALI v. SIBANDA et al
as 2:2016cv01643
Plaintiff:
WALI IBN AL-ISLAM ABD-ALI
Defendant:
SIBANDA, M. DIALESANDRO, K. SOKOL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BOOZER v. RIGGENBACH et al
as 2:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LONEY BOOZER
Defendant:
ANGELA RIGGENBACH, L.S. KERNS-BARR, MARK DIALESANDRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2016cv01167
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, FREIGHT, BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHALA v. DIMORA RISTORANTE, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03064
Plaintiff:
DUKAGJIN SHALA
Defendant:
DIMORA RISTORANTE, INC., SOKOL GJEVUKAJ, ARJANIT GJEVUKAJ and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DALIE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv00259
Plaintiff:
GEORGE DALIE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, DIANA WOODSIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
