Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv24610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Spence v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2026cv02653
Plaintiff:
Shane Spence
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Arkema, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Spence v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2026cv04387
Plaintiff:
Stevie Spence
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bayer v. Transdev North America Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv01793
Plaintiff:
Walter K Bayer
Defendant:
Walter K Bayer, Transdev North America, Inc., Transdev Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Colantonio v. Spence et al
as 2:2026cv03198
Plaintiff:
Anthony Colantonio
Defendant:
Adam Spence, Justin St.James and Frederic Ury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Cardello-Smith [ENJOINED FILER] v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2026cv11643
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Michigan Department of Corrections, T. Spence and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith [ENJOINED FILER]
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv80581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv80580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
