Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Yared Tesfaye v. State of Maryland
as 22-6066
Petitioner / Appellant:
YARED TESFAYE and YARED TESFAYE, a/k/a Tesfaye Kassaye Abebe
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SPRINGFIELD HOSPITAL CENTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00459
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re: Springfield Hospital
as 20-3902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Springfield Hospital, Inc. and Springfield Medical Care Systems, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant:
Jovita Carranza, in her capacity as Administrator for the U.S. Small Business Administration
In Re: Springfield Hospital
as 20-2884
Petitioner:
Springfield Hospital, Inc.
Respondent:
Jovita Carranza, in her capacity as Administrator for the U.S. Small Business Administration
Dalke et al v. Springfield Hospital Inc.
as 2:2019cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Dalke and Cammie Dalke
Defendant:
Springfield Hospital Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Director
as 1:2019cv01342
Defendant:
Warden and Director, Springfield Hospital Center
Plaintiff:
Joseph Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MountainFunds II, LLC v. Springfield Hospital, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
MountainFunds II, LLC
Defendant:
Springfield Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grimes v. Springfield Hospital Center
as 8:2017cv02189
Petitioner:
Jerome L. Grimes
Respondent:
Springfield Hospital Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRIMES v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE et al
as 1:2017cv01387
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE and SPRINGFIELD HOSPITAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grimes v. Springfield Hospital Center
as 8:2017cv01682
Plaintiff:
Jerome L Grimes
Defendant:
Springfield Hospital Center, Public Defenders Office and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
