Cases 31 - 40 of 306
Christy v. Sproul et al
as 3:2023cv00888
Petitioner:
Shawn R. Christy
Respondent:
Dan Sproul, Mrs. C. Sozal and Kirsten Nielson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gary v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
James L. Gary
Defendant:
USA, Kathy Hill, Dan Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garrison v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv00732
Petitioner:
Ricky Garrison
Respondent:
Warden Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DECKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLLETTE PETERS, SARA QURESHI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Doe 600 et al v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2023cv00445
Petitioner:
Doe 600 and Circle R Ranch
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Pekin, Illinois Federal Corrections Institute, Warden Dan Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Christy v. Sproul et al
as 1:2023cv00301
Petitioner:
Shawn R. Christy
Respondent:
Warden Sproul, Mrs. C. Sozal and Kirsten Nielson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Talib v. Graland et al
as 3:2023cv00458
Petitioner:
Yayah Talib
Respondent:
Merrick Graland and Dan Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pernell v. Does #1-7 et al
as 3:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Arya Milan Pernell and Aaron Pernell
Defendant:
John Does #1-7, Dan Sproul, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Decker v. Sproul
as 3:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
Robert K. Decker
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Matthew Sullivan v. Daniel Sproul
as 23-1133
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW SULLIVAN
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL SPROUL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
