Cases 1 - 10 of 121
St. Claire v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
as 8:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
Earl St. Claire
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
St. Claire v. Warden, FCC Coleman II
as 5:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
Earl St. Claire
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ST CLAIR BEY v. STORM et al
as 2:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
MAYSON ST CLAIR BEY
Defendant:
STORM, VANIHEL, GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. St. Clair Correctional Facility
as 4:2023cv01113
Plaintiff:
Royal D Scott
Defendant:
St. Clair Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bynum v. Task Force
as 3:2023cv02748
Plaintiff:
Darryl R Bynum
Defendant:
Task Force and St Clair County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ST CLAIR v. KEEN et al
as 4:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE ST CLAIR, JR
Defendant:
KEEN, CPT 1, CPT 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominique Glosson v. Dawn Jones, et al
as 23-1527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dominique Glosson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dawn Jones, LPN, St. Clair County Jail and Sammy Bowden, Jail Administrator, St. Clair County Jail
Lowman et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Lowman, Christopher T. Farr, Monte J Conrad, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Richard Watson, Tammy Grime, St. Clair County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Weaver v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv03747
Plaintiff:
Devin Thomas Weaver
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Rhonda Simmous, Mike Molinary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell Marbury v. Cynthia Stewart, et al
as 22-13355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHELL MARBURY
Defendant / Appellee:
CYNTHIA STEWART, WARDEN, ST. CLAIR CF and J. BULLARD, Correctional Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
