Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Johnson v. Murray State University et al
as 5:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Johnson
Defendant:
Murray State University, Cynthia Elliott, Camisha Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Stacy Johnson
as 13-10466
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STACY JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Johnson v. Food Concepts International, LP et al
as 2:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Stacie Johnson
Defendant:
Food Concepts International, LP , Abuelo's International LP , Mark Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
USA v. Stacy Johnson
as 12-10464
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STACY JOHNSON
Brady v. Pannu
as 12-440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darren Brady
Defendant - Appellee:
Jasdeep Singh Pannu, Edward J. Cashman, Judge, Stacie Johnson, Esq., Trial Counsel for Juvenile and others
Brady v. Pannu et al
as 5:2011cv00308
Plaintiff:
Darren Brady
Defendant:
Jasdeep Singh Pannu, Edward J. Cashman, Stacie Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Brett v. Frank Izzi, et al
as 11-3637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK IZZI, FRANK RUFFO, FRANK MCMENAMIN and others
Johnson v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00284
Plaintiff:
Stacy Johnson
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Pharma Stein AG and Novartis AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Klein et al v. Downtown Restaurant Group, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv09245
Plaintiff:
Charles Klein and Stacy Johnson-Klein
Defendant:
Downtown Restaurant Group, LLC, The Griffin Nightclub, RSNYC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
