Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STAFFORD v. UNKNOWN NCDPS OFFICIALS
as 1:2023cv01121
Plaintiff:
DELVIN STAFFORD
Defendant:
UNKNOWN NCDPS OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAFFORD v. GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
DELVIN STAFFORD
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Headstart Warranty Group, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Headstart Warranty Group, LLC, Vehicle Service Department, Sing for Service, LLC doing business as MEPCO and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
El v. Horowitz et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
My'Ka El
Defendant:
Michael E Horowitz, US Department of Justice, Gretchen C.F. Shappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stafford v. Hoekstra et al
as 3:2021cv00590
Petitioner:
Damon Demond Stafford
Respondent:
Casandra Hoekstra, Warden Stephen Jacobs and Stephen Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stafford v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
as 3:2021cv00127
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1
Plaintiff:
Cherilynn K Stafford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
STAFFORD v. STOUT et al
as 1:2020cv00731
Defendant:
OFFICER LAND, CAPTAIN ROGERS, SERGENT STOUT and others
Plaintiff:
DELVIN STAFFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
