Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., et al v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Defendant:
BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Interested Party:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, SARAH COLE, NEW ENGLAND FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv07757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
H o/b/o Harry Hamilton et al v. Hamilton et al
as 3:2021cv00501
Defendant:
Amanda Ackley, Pennsylvania State University Athletics Department, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Harry E. Hamilton and H o/b/o Harry Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yi v. Stanford University et al
as 5:2021cv01918
Defendant:
Sheriff Laurie Smith, Caesar Campos, Stanford University and others
Plaintiff:
G Yi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv07749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lopshire v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 4:2018cv00333
Defendant:
Pima County Board of Administrator, Lisa Green, James Marner and others
Plaintiff:
Caraleen Marie Lopshire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-16150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02895
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
