Cases 1 - 10 of 100
STAPLES v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv12141
Plaintiff:
DEREK STAPLES
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cunningham v. Taylor et al
as 4:2026cv07294
Plaintiff:
Gregory Demon Cunningham
Defendant:
Gregory Taylor, Michael Skinner, Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Staples v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv09755
Plaintiff:
Regina Staples
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., LOreal USA, Inc., LOreal USA Products, Inc. and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 Family and Medical Leave Act
The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System v. Staples Street Meat Market, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00222
Plaintiff:
The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System
Defendant:
Staples Street Meat Market, LLC and Michael Meehan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
