Cases 21 - 30 of 44,844
Johnson v. Milstead et al
as 4:2024cv04094
Petitioner:
Darrian Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Mike Milstead and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Rooks
as 6:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Franklin Innis Rooks
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 3116 VA Overpayment
Hamner v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torre v. State of California et al
as 5:2024cv05030
Plaintiff:
Robert Carmelo Torre
Defendant:
State of California, Gavin Christopher Newsom, Rob Andres Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
United States v. LaVance Cooper
as 24-1998
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
LaVance LeMarr Cooper
United States v. Shannon Thomas
as 24-1994
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Shannon R. Thomas
Lorenzo Harris-Thompson v. United States
as 24-1995
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Harris-Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
United States of America v. Handley
as 6:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Granger Handley
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Boyer v. Iowa State Patrol et al
as 4:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Boyer
Defendant:
Iowa State Patrol and Alex Dinkla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Dudley v. State of Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv04038
Plaintiff:
Karanya Marquis Dudley
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, State Trooper Jacob Meadows and State of Arkansas Headquarters Troop 6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
