Cases 1 - 10 of 805,291
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lykens v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Scott Lykens
Defendant:
Colete S. Peters, James Petrucci, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gaines v. State of California
as 3:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Ronisha Sharde Gaines
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Elliott v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Donald Brainard Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Monroe v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Charles Walter Monroe, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
LUCAS v. BRITTAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
KEYON LUCAS
Respondent:
KATHY J. BRITTAIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KENON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
CARLOS S KENON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McGucken v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03529
Plaintiff:
Dr. Elliot McGucken
Defendant:
Lenovo (United States) Inc., Newegg Inc., HP Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
United States of America v. Banguguilan
as 2:2024cv03516
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cyr Dino Banguguilan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
