Cases 1 - 10 of 8,158
Alabama, State of et al v. Cardona et al
as 7:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Alabama, State of, Florida, State of, Georgia, State of and others
Defendant:
Miguel Cardona and U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC and Norcold, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
State of Alabama v. Berger
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
Kenneth Douglas Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Griggs v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
David Earl Griggs
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Garrett v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Justin Garrett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
State Of Alabama et al v. Casey
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
State Of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Kiley Casey
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Riner v. State Farm Fire and Casulty Company
as 2:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Riner
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casulty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney
as 2:2024mc04020
Not Yet Classified:
In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney
Foster v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00490
Petitioner:
Javon Santrell Foster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
