Cases 31 - 40 of 623
Gonzalez v. North Dakota, State of
as 1:2023cv00104
Petitioner:
Garron Gonzalez
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKenzie County, North Dakota v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
McKenzie County, North Dakota
Defendant:
United States of America
Banerjee v. Brady et al
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joyanta Banerjee
Defendant:
Reid A. Brady, East Central Judicial District and North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Torkelsen v. State of North Dakota
as 1:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Steven A. Torkelsen
Respondent:
State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oien v. North Dakota, State of
as 3:2023cv00066
Petitioner:
Jason Wayne Oien
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. $42,200 in United States Currency
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$42,200 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Happel v. Pringle
as 3:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Tyson Happel
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of and Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Happel v. Pringle
as 3:2023cv00046
Petitioner:
Tyson Happel
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of and Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DL Farms LLC et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
DL Farms LLC and Darren Tronson
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Risk Management Agency and Marcia Bunger
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
