Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Krause, et al. v. Chawla, et al.
as 23-4436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERNEST KRAUSE, ATTORNEY and FREDERICK MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
MANJARI CHAWLA, LEAH T. WILSON, Executive Director of State Bar of CA, RUBEN DURAN, Chair of the Board of Trustees of State Bar of CA and others
Castaneda v. State of CA, et al
as 21-2134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE CASTANEDA
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CA, C.O.L.A., CITY OF L.A. and others
Jose Castaneda v. State of CA et al
as 2:2021cv07156
Plaintiff:
Jose Castaneda
Defendant:
State of CA, C.O.L.A., City of L.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Estate of Castaneda, et al v. The Law Office of Jack Kenneth, et al
as 19-55698
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE BOEHLE, THE LAW OFFICE OF JACK KENNETH CONWAY, IVAN SHOMER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE CASTANEDA, Executor of Estate in GP013531, GP003849, and GP013952, Pending, AKA James Blume and ESTATE OF CASTANEDA
Estate of Castaneda et al v. The L.A.S.C. et al
as 2:2019cv00736
Defendant:
Judge Debre Katz Weintraub, Does 1-100, James R. Felton and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Castaneda and Jose Castaneda
Damon A. Duval v. Roy L. Kight et al
as 2:2015cv03585
Defendant:
CA Administrator of the Courts, CA Commission on Judicial Performance, CA Judicial Council and others
Plaintiff:
Damon A. Duval
Johnny Ortega et al v. State Of California et al
as 5:2013cv00025
Defendant:
Dianne C Blasdel, T G Cantil-Sakauye, Clerk of ISC and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ortega and Jerome Richard Shawke
Dennis v. Ayers
as 5:1998cv21027
Petitioner:
William Michael Dennis
Miscellaneou:
State Bar of CA , California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
