Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al. v. Stratfs, LLC et al.
as 2:2024ms00010
Defendant:
Stratfs, LLC, Strategic Client Support, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of the State of New York, Attorney General of the State of New York and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Michael Burch v. State of New York
as 2:2023cv09057
Plaintiff:
Michael Burch
Defendant:
State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Amazon.com Inc
as 2:2023cv01495
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, State of New York, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc
Intervenor:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Jason Wolford, et al v. Anne Lopez
as 23-16164
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JASON WOLFORD, ALISON WOLFORD, ATOM KASPRZYCKI and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANNE E. LOPEZ, in her official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky et al v. Labrador et al
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Caitlin Gustafson and Darin Weyhrich
Defendant:
Raul Labrador, Members of the Idaho State Board of Medicine, Idaho State Board of Nursing and others
Amicus Curiae:
St. Luke's Health System Ltd., State of Arizona, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Citizens for Clean Energy, et al v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 22-35790
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITIZENS FOR CLEAN ENERGY, ECOCHEYENNE, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, STATE OF WYOMING and STATE OF MONTANA
Citizens for Clean Energy, et al v. National Mining Association
as 22-35789
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CITIZENS FOR CLEAN ENERGY, ECOCHEYENNE, MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior and BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION, STATE OF WYOMING and STATE OF MONTANA
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party:
Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court:
ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
