Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 41
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16095
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16094
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARIZONA, ex rel. the Arizona Game and Fish Commission and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16093
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16096
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
United States of America et al v. Bridger Pipeline LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff: United States of America and State of North Dakota
Defendant: Bridger Pipeline LLC and Belle Fourche Pipeline Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv08271
Plaintiff: Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant: HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff: State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant: Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Robert Swint v. Oregon State Hospital, et al
as 21-35375
Defendant / Appellee: AM BEST, AMTRAK, 62 BILLION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROBERT JAMES SWINT
Swint v. Oregon State Mental Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00531
Defendant: Spacex, State of Oregon, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff: Robert James Swint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant: Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff: Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant: Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court: Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant: Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party: Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner: Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?