Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 47
State of Washington, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35394
Plaintiff / Appellee: NATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION, STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEBORAH OYER, M.D. and others
Defendant / Appellant: DIANE FOLEY, MD, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF OHIO, AND 12 OTHER STATES, SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST and AMERICANS UNITED FOR LIFE
State of Washington v. Azar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03040
Plaintiff: State of Washington, Deborah Oyer, National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association and others
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M Azar, II, Diane Foley and others
Amicus Curiae: American College of Physicians, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
American Medical Association et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00318
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Population Affairs and others
Plaintiff: American Medical Association, Michele P. Megregian, C.N.M., Thomas N. Ewing, M.D. and others
Amicus Curiae: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Oregon et al v. Azar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00317
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Oregon Medical Association, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon, American Medical Association and others
Amicus Curiae: New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Mikkel Jordahl, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 18-16896
Amicus Curiae: LAWRENCE GLICKMAN, Professor at Cornell University, 25 ARIZONA LEGISLATORS, GOVERNOR OF ARIZONA, STATE OF KANSAS and others
Defendant: MATT RYAN, JIM PARKS, in their official capacity as Coconino County Jail District Board of Directors Members, ART BABBOTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MIKKEL JORDAHL and MIKKEL (MIK) JORDAHL, PC
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: STATE OF ARIZONA
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, in his official capacity as Arizona Attorney General
United States of America v. State of California et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00490
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: State of California , Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr. and Xavier Becerra
Amicu: American Center for Law and Justice , State of Texas , State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Black v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2017cv00158
Plaintiff: James Darnell Black
Defendant: State of Ohio, Ashland County Prosecutor Office, Ashland County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Ohio v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 3:2016cv07157
Plaintiff: State of Ohio
Defendant: Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft , Volkswagen Group of America Inc , Audi of America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Jackson v. State of Ohio
as 2:2016cv00709
Petitioner: London Jackson
Respondent: State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?