Antitrust Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 37
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03715
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv03539
Plaintiff: State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, Commonwealth (of) Pennsylvania and others
Defendant: MALLINCKRODT PLC, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, JOHN WESOLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00802
Defendant: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, State of Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02407
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., Richard Rogerson, WOCKHARDT USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03768
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and others
In Re: STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL LITIGATION
Respondent: STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL PLAINTIFFS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of Alabama et al v. Endo International PLC, et al
as 3:2019cv04157
Plaintiff: State of Arkansas, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceutical Inc., Endo international PLC. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. Featured Case
as 3:2019cv00710
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: Actavis Pharma, Inc., Richard Rogerson, Nisha Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant: Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor: Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein and Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court: Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Counter Defendant: Rockwell Automation Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Acer America Corporation and others
Interested Party: Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Counter Claimant: LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: State of South Carolina and State of California
Claimant: Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee: Charles W Daff
Petitioner: Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant: Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
STATE OF WISCONSIN et al v. INDIVIOR INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv05073
Plaintiff: STATE OF WISCONSIN , STATE OF ALABAMA , STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant: INDIVIOR INC. , RECKITTBENCHISER HEALTHCARE (UK) LTD. , INDIVIOR PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?