Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Robert Decker v. Lilita Infante, et al
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
LILITA INFANTE, D.E.A. Special Agent, JASON HAYES, Task Force Officer, aka Jason Heyes, RAPHAEL GARCIA, U.S. Postal Inspector Service and others
Robert Decker v. Lilita Infante, et al
as 24-1077
Plaintiff:
ROBERT K. DECKER
Defendant:
LILITA INFANTE, D.E.A. Special Agent, JASON HAYES, T.F.O., aka Jason Heyes, RAPHAEL GARCIA, U.S.P.I.S. Inspector and others
Mason v. Esteban
as 1:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Alexander John Mason, III, Dr. Christine Elizabeth Smith Mason, Alexander John Mason, IV and others
Defendant:
Marcos Monterrosas Esteban and Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mason v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv11802
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mason
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MASON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22020
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MASON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mason v. Cars.com, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv06847
Defendant:
Lead Intelligence, Inc. doing business as Jornaya and Cars.com, LLC
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2019cv07646
Petitioner:
Christine Boyd, Marissa Gazcon, Bryson Brown and others
Respondent:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Acosta v. Mason et al
as 3:2019cv01202
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Mas-Tek Engineering & Associates, Inc., Stephen Mason and Mas-Tek Engineering Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
United States of America v. Mason
as 2:2018mc50036
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Stephen Mason
Mason v. USA - 2255
as 8:2016cv02400
Petitioner:
Stephen Mason
Defendant:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
