Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Adair et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv12226
Plaintiff:
Theodore Adair, Charles Addis, George Alig and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Clariant Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Earhart et al v. City of Charleston
as 2:2025cv05121
Plaintiff:
Ryan Earhart, Cara Earhart, Kathryn Duke McGowan and others
Defendant:
City of Charleston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Murray v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv01892
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murray
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
RAMAPO HUNT AND POLO CLUB, INC. et al v. TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH
as 2:2020cv09313
Plaintiff:
Maria L Fabris, Cynthia Tafaro, Eric Boe and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. American Strategic Insurance Corp.
as 4:2018cv10254
Defendant:
American Strategic Insurance Corp.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
River Light V, L.P. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv05999
Plaintiff:
River Light V, L.P. and Tory Burch LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhou Ping, Zhou Bing and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Stephen Mitchell v. USA
as 17-5904
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEPHEN MURRAY MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stephen Mitchell v. USA
as 17-5905
Petitioner - Appellee:
STEPHEN MURRAY MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Stephen Mitchell
as 17-5906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN MURRAY MITCHELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
