Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Cerza et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00584
Plaintiff:
Michele Cerza, Christine Churik, Anna Milo and others
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Corporation and Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ADVANCED GYNECOLOGY AND LAPARASCOPY OF NORTH JERSEY, P.C. et al v. CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv22234
Plaintiff:
BERGEN SURGICAL SPECIALISTS, P.A., TRI-STATE SURGERY CENTER, LLC, ADVANCED GYNECOLOGY AND LAPARASCOPY OF NORTH JERSEY, P.C. and others
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Silver et al v. Karp et al
as 2:2014cv05226
3Rd Party Defendant:
Scott Silver
Defendant:
Beth E. Karp, Selwyn Karp, Jeffrey Karp and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Silver, Lyle Silver and David Silver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv01324
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Silver v. Giles et al
as 1:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
Stephen Silver
Defendant:
Mark Giles, Mark Lytle, Richard Rosenberg and others
Counter-claimant:
Gail Rutledge
Counter-defendant:
Stephen Silver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Glinkenhouse et al v. Silver
as 2:2007cv00462
Plaintiff:
Alan Glinkenhouse, Alan Glinkenhouse, Alan Glinkenhouse and others
Defendant:
Stephen Silver, Stephen Silver and Stephen Silver
Counter Claimant:
Stephen Silver, Stephen Silver and Stephen Silver
Counter Defendant:
Alan Glinkenhouse, Philip Floumanhaft and Alan Queen
ThirdParty Defendant:
glinkenhouse, floumanhaft and queen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
