Cases 31 - 40 of 443
Stepp v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01399
Plaintiff:
Cassie Stepp
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Julia Wolov v. David Duel, et al
as 23-55303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIA WOLOV, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID DUEL, REBECCA DUEL, ILANA YAMTOOBIAN and others
Stepp v. Myers et al
as 3:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Shawn David Stepp
Respondent:
Marcus Myers and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrison v. The Administrative Committee of Delta Air Lines, et al
as 23-1091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTA STEPP GARRISON
Defendant / Appellee:
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC., DELTA FAMILY-CARE DISABILITY AND SURVIVORSHIP PLAN and DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
United States v. Stepp
as 23-2029
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTIN STEPP
Pinkston v. Allen County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Sy-Bron L Pinkston
Defendant:
Allen County Sheriff Department, Andrew Bachl, Malachi Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stepp v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv10936
Plaintiff:
Tammy Stepp
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stepp v. Tew
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Shawn David Stepp
Defendant:
Robert S. Tew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stepp v. Buffaloe
as 5:2022hc02201
Petitioner:
Joshua Andrew Stepp
Respondent:
Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Martinez v. Campbell et al
as 1:2022cv01549
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Martinez
Defendant:
Tammy Campbell, Ken Clark, E. McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
