Cases 11 - 20 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Walker v. 20 Defendants et al
as 4:2022cv02653
Plaintiff:
Candace Lanell Walker and Candace Lanell Walker-Baldwin
Defendant:
20 Defendants, Arch Diocese, Cynthia Lanell Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08439
Plaintiff:
DENNIS STEVEN CARTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Carter v. DeKalb County Jail
as 1:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
Steven Carter
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Carter
as 22-627
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Steven Carter
WATSON v. NORMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
LAVARN C WATSON
Defendant:
JIMMY NORMAN, STEVEN CARTER and BO DOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. CITY OF ALBANY et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
LAVARN C WATSON
Defendant:
CITY OF ALBANY, MAYOR BO DOROUGH, CHIEF MICHAEL J PERSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATSON v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY LAW LIBRARY et al
as 1:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
LAVARN C WATSON
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY LAW LIBRARY, MICHAEL MCCOY, STEVEN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
STEVEN CARTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
