General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Stedman v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01832
Petitioner: Steven Craig Stedman
Respondent: Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steven Morrison v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 16-4340
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN CRAIG MORRISON
Defendant - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
MORRISON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2016cv05356
Petitioner: STEVEN CRAIG MORRISON
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powell v. Obenland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv05761
Petitioner: Steven Craig Powell
Respondent: Mike Obenland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steven Taylor v. Warden, et al
as 14-13949
Petitioner - Appellant: STEVEN CRAIG TAYLOR
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Williams v. Respondent
as 6:2014cv01289
Respondent: Respondent
Petitioner: Steven Craig Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steven Fults v. Eric Quall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5510
Petitioner - Appellant: STEVEN CRAIG FULTS
Respondent - Appellee: ERIC QUALLS
MORRISON v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LANCASTER, PENNA. et al
as 5:2013cv02408
Petitioner: STEVEN CRAIG MORRISON
Respondent: COURT OF COMMON PLEAS LANCASTER, PENNA., COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steven Morrison v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 12-4548
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN CRAIG MORRISON
Defendant - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Van Ross v. Shelton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3336
Petitioner - Appellant: STEVEN CRAIG VAN ROSS
Respondent - Appellee: J.L. SHELTON and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?