Cases 1 - 10 of 86
WRIGHT v. KEITH
as 2:2026cv01785
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAROLD STEVENS WRIGHT
Defendant:
LAWRENCE J. KEITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. ROBINSON
as 2:2026cv01787
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAROLD STEVENS WRIGHT
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. ROBINSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. ISENBERG
as 2:2026cv01786
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAROLD STEVENS WRIGHT
Defendant:
BOBBI JO ISENBERG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. CREIGHTON
as 2:2026cv01784
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAROLD STEVENS WRIGHT
Defendant:
WILLIAM S. CREIGHTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeAndrey Peterson v. Steven Wright, et al
as 26-5536
Plaintiff:
DEANDREY PETERSON
Defendant:
STEVEN WRIGHT, HANNAH EVANS, J.C. PUGH and others
WRIGHT v. LAWRENCE COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER et al
as 2:2026cv00473
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAROLD STEVENS WRIGHT
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES, BUTLER COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. KEITH
as 2:2026cv00321
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAROLD STEVENS WRIGHT
Defendant:
LAWRENCE J. KEITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. OLSON JR. et al
as 2:2026cv00320
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAROLD STEVENS WRIGHT
Defendant:
BRADLEY OLSON JR., DAVID H. ACKER, LAWRENCE J. KEITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. ISENBERG et al
as 2:2025cv01958
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAROLD STEVENS WRIGHT
Defendant:
BOBBI JO ISENBERG, JUDGE DAVID H ACKER, JUDGE ROBERT YEATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. KERR et al
as 2:2025cv01594
Plaintiff:
EDWARD HAROLD STEVENS WRIGHT
Defendant:
OFFICER ERIC KERR, CITY OF NEW CASTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF NEW CASTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
