Cases 1 - 10 of 22
(PC) Stith et al v. State of California, et al.
as 1:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
Charlene Stith, Victoria Green, Tremaine Carroll and others
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), Greg Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Stith v. Darlene et al
as 2:2021cv01478
Plaintiff:
Theodore Ervin Stith
Defendant:
Secretary Darlene, Simmons and Darlene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black Lives Matter - Los Angeles et al v. Eric Garcetti et al
as 2:2020cv04940
Defendant:
Teri Ledoux, City of Los Angeles, City of San Bernardino and others
Plaintiff:
Tom Dolan, Eric Jeffrey Stith, Black Lives Matter - Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Stith v. People of the State of Calfornia
as 2:2019cv01258
Respondent:
People of the State of Calfornia
Petitioner:
Theodore Ervin Stith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03682
Plaintiff:
Roy Stith
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lily Aasland et al v. Orange County Batbusters et al
as 8:2017cv01491
Defendant:
Tony Bracamonte, DOES, Clay Lara and others
Plaintiff:
L.A.
Stith v. Warden
as 2:2017cv01064
Petitioner:
Theodore Ervin Stith
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stith v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2016cv00794
Petitioner:
Toney Eugene Stith
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv01849
Plaintiff:
Andrea Stith
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stith v. McComber
as 2:2015cv00504
Petitioner:
Theodore Ervin Stith
Respondent:
Jeffery McComber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
