Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv14078
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tafoya v. Barksdale et al
as 4:2026cv03259
Plaintiff:
Schuyler Tafoya
Defendant:
Andrew Barksdale, Bill Koepke, Officer Allen # 1969 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamel v. Pediatric Healthcare Unlimited, et al
as 3:2026cv01061
Defendant:
PEDIATRIC HEALTHCARE UNLIMITED and MISTY STRODE
Plaintiff:
Jessica Hamel
Cause Of Action: 1 U.S.C. § 102 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doe v. Shafer et al
as 4:2026cv03126
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Wyatt Shafer and Amy Strode
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Strode v. Village of Washington Park, Illinois et al
as 3:2026cv00450
Plaintiff:
Marvin B. Strode
Defendant:
Village of Washington Park, Illinois, Angie Rodgers, Anita Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Don R. Clark, Jr., et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
as 26-1461
Plaintiff:
Don R. Clark, Jr., Adonis H. Clark, Sherrie Clark-Torrence and others
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Nicholas Manasco, in his individual capacity and Thomas Strode, in his individual capacity
United States of America v. Strode
as 26-1541
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROBERT STRODE
STRODE v. SINGH et al
as 1:2026cv00448
Plaintiff:
SHELLIESE STRODE
Defendant:
ONKAR SINGH and SPARROW TRANSPORT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
