Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Samaroo et al v. Rockaway Beach Service Station Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Raymond Samaroo, Sukhjinder Singh and Simranjit Singh
Defendant:
Rockaway Beach Service Station Inc. and Xubing Chen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Sukhjinder Singh v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2200
Petitioner:
SUKHJINDER SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Singh v. Garland
as 21-6275
Petitioner:
SUKHJINDER SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Benton v. Blue Roan Trucking, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
Raymond M. Benton
Defendant:
Blue Roan Trucking, Inc. and Sukhjinder Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knight Rider Transportation, Inc. et al v. United Specialty Insurance Company
as 7:2021cv00364
Plaintiff:
Knight Rider Transportation, Inc., FoxFire Recovery Solution, Inc. and Sukhjinder Singh
Defendant:
United Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benton v. Blue Roan Trucking, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00784
Defendant:
Blue Roan Trucking, Inc. and Sukhjinder Singh
Plaintiff:
Raymond M Benton and Raymond M. Benton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SINGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13815
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SUKHJINDER SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
