Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Perry v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv50119
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Mr. Avery, Karen Smiddy, Mr. Bungard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Watson v. D. Sward, et al
as 23-2636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS K. WATSON
Defendant / Appellee:
D. SWARD, Correctional Officer, Z. DENNISTON, Lieutenant, THOMAS BERGAMI, Warden, Warden and others
Sward v. Medical Properties Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03070
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sward
Defendant:
Medical Properties Trust, Inc., Edward K. Aldag, Jr. and R. Steven Hamner
Watson v. Sward et al
as 3:2023cv50051
Plaintiff:
Marcus Kalani Watson
Defendant:
D. Sward, Z. Denniston, Bergami and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv50042
Plaintiff:
Elroda Shavaya Thompson and Elroda Shavon Thompson
Defendant:
Collette Peters, United States, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Venard et al
as 1:2022cv01204
Plaintiff:
Antonio Anthony Shaw
Defendant:
Venard, Gaston, Grunwalnard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26369
Plaintiff:
AMOS SWARD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jared Swords v. BNSF Railway Company
as 0:2021cv00055
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Jared Swards and Jared Swords
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Rochester v. Town of Milo et al
as 6:2020cv07006
Defendant:
Jared Webster, P. Earle Gleason, Town of Milo and others
Plaintiff:
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Rochester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bock v. Sward et al
as 8:2018cv00586
Defendant:
Jason M. Sward and KLLM Transport Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Karl J. Bock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
