Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Ronald Neil Kaplan v. Swissport SA, LLC
as 2:2019cv07899
Plaintiff:
Ronald Neil Kaplan
Defendant:
SWISSPORT SA, LLC and Swissport SA, LLC Erroneously Sued As Swissport USA, Inc. doing business as Swissport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scarlett v. Doe et al
as 2:2019cv01418
Plaintiff:
MD Jane Doe, Megan Scarlett and John Doe
Defendant:
Swissport Cargo Services LP, Jane Doe, Swissport USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11648
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Forbes v. Swissport USA, Inc.
as 1:2019cv23036
Defendant:
Swissport USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Barry Forbes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Forbes v. Swissport USA, Inc.
as 1:2019cv23038
Defendant:
Swissport USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Barry Forbes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Badar et al v. Swissport USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06390
Defendant:
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Swissport USA, Inc. and Pakistan International Airlines
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Shafqat, Chaudhry Badar, Bilal Badar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
VINASCO v. Swissport Cargo Services, LP
as 4:2018cv01902
Plaintiff:
INGRID L VINASCO, Nicholas Johnson, Jvon Robertson and others
Defendant:
Swissport USA, Inc. and Swissport Cargo Services, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dodd v. Swissport USA Inc.
as 1:2017cv01007
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Dodd
Defendant:
Swissport USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ivonne Moncerat Avila v. Swissport SA, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05974
Plaintiff:
Ivonne Moncerat Avila
Defendant:
Does, Swissport SA, LLC and Swissport USA, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
