Cases 21 - 30 of 294
O'Quinn v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv50276
Plaintiff:
Chester O'Quinn
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hello Beautiful Salon, Inc. v. Dimoplon et al
as 1:2023cv04803
Plaintiff:
Hello Beautiful Salon, Inc.
Defendant:
Kristina Dimoplon, Justin Goslin and Live by the Sword
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lindsey v. Dahstrom et al
as 3:2023cv50219
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lindsey
Defendant:
Dahstrom, Kilmer, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tour Bus Leasing LLC v. Crown & Sword Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Tour Bus Leasing LLC
Defendant:
Crown & Sword Inc. and Tauren Strickland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Swords et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01512
Plaintiff:
Harold Swords, Jr and Judy Swords
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Marshall v. Taylor et al
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Krystal Marshall
Defendant:
School Nurse Darin Taylor, School Aid Theresa Taylor, Religious Pope Bob and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Barghouti v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50089
Plaintiff:
Eiad Barghouti
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Dr. Sy, N.P. Tuell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melvin King, III v. Ta'Kisha Fitzgerald, et al
as 23-5155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN R. KING, III
Defendant / Appellee:
TA'KISHA FITZGERALD, STEVEN W. SWORD, RANDALL E. NICHOLS and others
Barber v. Moss et al
as 3:2023cv50063
Plaintiff:
Derrick Barber
Defendant:
Patrick Moss and C. Sword
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dayvon Grant v. Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Correcti, et al
as 23-10395
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAYVON A. GRANT
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT TOOLE, KEVIN SPRAYBERRY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
