Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv00747
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gevas v. Sy et al
as 3:2026cv50420
Plaintiff:
David Gevas
Defendant:
Dr. Larry O. Sy, Monica Fuller, Andrea Tack and others
:
Scanning Dixon and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Syed v. Blue Water Shrimp Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv02065
Plaintiff:
Mr. Aaron Syed
Defendant:
Mr. Bobby Picou and Blue Water Shrimp Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-3270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Foster v. Innovator Step LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00704
Plaintiff:
Ronald H. Foster
Defendant:
Innovator Step LLC, NextZen Minds LLC and Syed Ali Arsalan Naqvi
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ahmed v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv10829
Plaintiff:
Syed Ahmed
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02531
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Connor Huntley v. Sheriff of Hillsborough County, et al
as 26-13086
Plaintiff:
CONNOR THOMAS HUNTLEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, SYED SALMAN and AMELIA J. TENNEY-LAMOUREUX
RIZVI et al v. RUBIO et al
as 1:2026cv03022
Plaintiff:
SYED RASHID RIZVI and FARAH RASHID RIZVI
Defendant:
MARCO RUBIO and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Ray v. West Virginia Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2026cv00533
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Human Services, Jamie Gunnoe, Pepper Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
