Cases 1 - 10 of 12
James v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02335
Plaintiff:
Sylvester James
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
James v. Townsent et al
as 4:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Myron Sylveste James
Defendant:
J Townsent, T Solmon Murice, J F Dimes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bibbs v. James et al
as 4:2019cv00156
Defendant:
Mayor Sylvester James, City Attorney Cecelia Abbott, City Manager Troy Schulte and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Bibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J. v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2015cv00621
Plaintiff:
Z. J.
Defendant:
Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners , Alvin Brooks , Michael Rader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kilgore et al
as 4:2014cv00785
Plaintiff:
Tina Smith
Defendant:
Michael Kilgore, Alvin Brooks, Angela Wasson-Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gene Dudley, Sr. v. K. C. Missouri Police Dept., et al
as 14-2917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gene Dudley, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Kansas City Missouri Police Department, Alvin Brooks, Michael Rader and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Fleming v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2013cv00929
Plaintiff:
James Fleming
Defendant:
Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners , Alvin Brooks , Lisa Pelofsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley, Sr. v. Kansas City Missouri Police Department, et al
as 4:2013cv00918
Plaintiff:
Gene Dudley, Sr.
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri Police Department , Alvin Brooks , Michael Rader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
