Cases 1 - 10 of 15
PINCKNEY v. SYNDER et al
as 2:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENRY PINCKNEY
Defendant:
STEVEN SYNDER, THOMAS RINALDI and CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ivy v. Williamsport Bureau of Police et al
as 4:2023cv01442
Plaintiff:
Jabril Ivy
Defendant:
Williamsport Bureau of Police, Lycoming County, J. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coit v. Marsh et al
as 1:2022cv01567
Plaintiff:
Kevin Terrance Coit
Defendant:
R. Marsh, J.D. Malishaik, B. Synder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNYDER v. KERTES et al
as 2:2021cv01620
Plaintiff:
GREGG L. SYNDER and GREGG L. SNYDER
Defendant:
CHAIRMAN SEAN KERTES, VICE-CHAIRMAN DOUGLAS W. CHEW, SECRETARY GINA CERILLI-SLASHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Saez et al v. Hudock et al
as 1:2021cv00290
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Michael Piecuch, John A. Zechman and others
Petitioner:
Ralph Saez and Helen Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MENTZER et al v. EID'S GRANDKIDS, LLC et al
as 5:2020cv01816
Defendant:
FERIAL EID, EID'S GRANDKIDS, LLC, MARK EID and others
Plaintiff:
ARLIE MORSE and TINA MENTZER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PARKER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01143
Defendant:
CLARKE, CAIN, MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PICOZZI v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv02277
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PICOZZI
Defendant:
ALLAN ROBERT SYNDER, WILLIAM J. BENZ and BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SYNDER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv09049
Plaintiff:
NANCY SYNDER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
