Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Cotton v. Noeth et al
as 1:2018cv01426
Defendant:
S. DeGroat, T. Barber, Anne Marie McGrath and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VeLasquaz v. Uttecht et al
as 4:2016cv05068
Plaintiff:
Jose VeLasquaz
Defendant:
Jeffery Uttecht, R Relyea, C Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Clarke
as 2:2016cv00017
Petitioner:
Ovell T. Barber
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barber v. Attorney General of Virginia
as 2:2015cv00374
Petitioner:
Ovell T. Barber
Respondent:
Attorney General of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Muasau v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00205
Plaintiff:
Maua Muasau
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, R Relyes, T Barber-Fishe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Copeland et al
as 7:2012cv00533
Plaintiff:
Ovell T. Barber
Defendant:
Sgt. K. Copeland, S. Owens and M. Vargo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roderick Barber v. James Walker
as 12-56992
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODERICK T. BARBER
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES WALKER, Warden
Marshall v. Jayne et al
as 6:2012cv06127
Plaintiff:
Deatrick Marshall
Defendant:
Paul E. Jayne, Ronald H. Kennell, P. Mastrantonio, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ovell Barber v. Doctor Elli
as 11-7736
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OVELL T. BARBER
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR ELLIS, Doctor, Greensville Correctional Center, PAMELA D. WARREN, Doctor, Greensville Correctional Center, DOCTOR AMONETTE, Doctor, Powhatan Correctional Center and others
Abreu v. Farley
as 11-3533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric Farley, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility, Kyler Kennedy, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility, Barry Countryman, Correction Officer at Five Points Correctional Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
