Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa v. Doe
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Commissioner, JOHN DOE, Warden, VIKI S. BLUMBERG, Medical Doctor and others
James Logan v. J. Godwin, et al
as 22-14171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. GODWIN, T. DYKES, P. WHITE and others
LOGAN v. GODWIN et al
as 3:2022cv09565
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant:
GODWIN, T DYKES, P WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DYKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv23798
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
T DYKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. JONES et al.
as 3:2018cv02118
Defendant:
T DYKES, MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, PARKER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY B BROWN and JEFFERY B BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd Martin, III, et al v. William Magee, et al
as 12-30263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LLOYD RAYMOND MARTIN, III, NICOLE EASTERWOOD MARTIN, CAROL ROBINSON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM M MAGEE, ACQUISITIVE PRESCRIPTION, L.L.C., A.P. SAINT TAMMANY, L.L.C. and others
Martin et al v. Magee et al
as 2:2010cv02786
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Russell Martin , Nicole Easterwood Martin , Carol Robinson and others
Defendant:
William M Magee, William M Magee, APLC, Acquisitive Prescriptions, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Dykes v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2009cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jonathan T Dykes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hancock v. Dykes et al
as 2:2007cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hancock
Defendant:
Larry T. Dykes, Thomas Eason, Max Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
