Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Travillion v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02075
Plaintiff:
Jamar L. Travillion
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #4, John/Jane Doe #1, Mr. FNU Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McElvine v. Beaver et al
as 5:2017ct03277
Plaintiff:
Jenyon McElvine
Defendant:
Ken Beaver, Edward Gazoo, William T Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zabala v. Rogers et al
as 4:2015cv05056
Plaintiff:
Juan A Zabala
Defendant:
Frank T Rogers, Noah Stewart, Okanogan County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Jennings
Defendant:
State of Washington, County of Okanogan, Karl F Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv01227
Plaintiff:
Dewey Terry
Defendant:
Brad Smith, Phillip Earley, Gary Loredo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Oklahoma Bar Association et al
as 5:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Demetrius T Rogers
Defendant:
Oklahoma Bar Association and Gina Hendryx
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Denecke
as 12-6198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS T. ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND E. DENECKE
Rogers v. Denecke
as 5:2012cv00373
Plaintiff:
Demetrius T Rogers
Defendant:
Raymond E Denecke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Kansas Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 11-3124
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY WAYNE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHARLES E. SIMMONS, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections, BILL CUMMINGS, Deputy Secretary of Corrections/Risk Management, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Smith v. McKune, et al
as 08-3253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY WAYNE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden, JOHN R COOLING, ROBERT ARNOLD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
