Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Malloy v. Trileaf Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Deborah Malloy
Defendant:
Trileaf Corporation and T. Scott Muschany
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Scott v. United Services Automobile Association et al
as 2:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
L T Scott
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association and USAA General Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Hill v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN T. HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, JIM BONNIFIELD, Community Resource Manag., official capacity and individual capacity, B. LAYES, Office Technician, official and individual capacity and others
Daontae Scott v. E. Perez Lugo, et al
as 23-14177
Plaintiff:
DAONTAE T. SCOTT
Defendant:
E. PEREZ LUGO, AUBREY PADGETT, CHRISTINA CREWS and others
McQueen v. Department of Corrections Inmates et al
as 5:2023cv01610
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne McQueen
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Inmates, T Scott, Healthcare Doctors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Scott v. Crews et al
as 3:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Daontae T. Scott
Defendant:
Christina Crews, Alvia I. Varona, Aubrey Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Perez Lugo et al
as 3:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Daontae T. Scott
Defendant:
E. Perez Lugo, Aubrey Padgett, Christina Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Jason Scott
as 23-4268
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON T. SCOTT
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
