Cases 31 - 40 of 1,224
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Headwater Partners II LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Headwater Partners II LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc., Sprint LLC, AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jones v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11294
Plaintiff:
Brian G Jones
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
Pegasus Wireless Innovation LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., Sprint LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Rose v. Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
as 0:2023mc62400
Plaintiff:
William Rose
Defendant:
Cellular Touch Wireless, Inc.
Material Witne:
KPMG, LLP
Intervenor:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
ROSE v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
as 2:2023cv23321
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ROSE
Respondent:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Interested Party:
CELLULAR TOUCH WIRELESS, INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
