Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Brewers v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv04167
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Brewers
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Keith v. Summers et al
as 4:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean Keith
Defendant:
Summers, Smith, DeCastro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Healy v. Miller et al
as 4:2024cv04053
Plaintiff:
Bret Healy
Defendant:
Charlene Miller, Patrick T. Smith, First Judicial Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Harlan v. O'Donnell
as 4:2023cv04214
Petitioner:
Lance T. Harlan
Respondent:
Warden O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harlan v. O'Donnell
as 3:2023cv03034
Petitioner:
Lance T. Harlan
Respondent:
Warden O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stading v. Pesall et al
as 4:2023cv04153
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stading
Defendant:
Noel Robert Pesall, William C. Garry, Patrick T. Pardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Looks Twice v. Williamson et al
as 4:2022cv04157
Plaintiff:
David Stephan Looks Twice and Kurt Douglas Andrews
Defendant:
Lori Williamson, Sara Jo Kegler, Dan Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaRoche v. United State of America
as 3:2022cv03013
Plaintiff:
Jade T. LaRoche
Defendant:
United State of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rindahl v. Malsam-Rysdon et al
as 4:2022cv04073
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Kim Malsam-Rysdon, Joan Adam, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Boyer et al
as 5:2022cv05037
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Stephen A. Boyer, Pete Flores, Josh Haeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.