Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Steve Riddick v. C. Mickles
as 23-6655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK, a/k/a Steven Riddick
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MICKLES, C/O C. TAYLOR, C/O J. BOYD and others
Defendant:
LT. T. L. WOODS, LARRY MULLENS, Hearings Officer and WARDEN JEFFREY KISER
Steve Riddick v. C. Mickles
as 23-6477
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK, a/k/a Steven Riddick
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MICKLES, C/O J. BOYD, C/O J. GILBERT and others
Carter v. Ramey et al
as 7:2021cv00348
Defendant:
A. Duncan, Fleming, #1 Doe Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. US District Ct, Big Stone Gap
as 19-6933
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, J. H. MIDDLETON, J.B. MESSER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Shawn Frost, Sr. v. J. Hallock, et al
as 19-15674
Defendant / Appellee:
D. MELTON, Correctional Counselor, A. BOND, Appeals Coordinator, CLARK E. DUCART, Warden, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Defendant:
R. E. BARNES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN KEVIN FROST, Sr.
David Meyers v. US District Ct, Big Stone Gap
as 19-6173
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY PONTON, J. H. MIDDLETON, J.B. MESSER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Frost v. Hallock et al
as 3:2017cv07229
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kevin Frost, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Hallock, J. Hunt, T. A. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Franklin v. Lewis, et al
as 17-16147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY ANTHONY FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
G. D. LEWIS, Warden, M. A. COOK, P. J. SMITH and others
Raymond Manzanillo v. Gregory Lewis, et al
as 17-15049
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RAYMOND J. MANZANILLO
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY D. LEWIS, K. MCGUYER, T. A. WOOD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
