Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Conklin v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 23-8003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK T. CONKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Defendant:
AFOD FRANZ JEUDY, DFODs SCOTT MECHKOWSKI, DARIUS REEVES and others
Smith-Duffy v. City of Marietta et al
as 1:2022cv03844
Plaintiff:
Taylor Smith-Duffy
Defendant:
City of Marietta, Dan Flynn, Dylan T. Conklin and others
Smith-Duffy v. City of Marietta et al
as 1:2021cv01762
Plaintiff:
Taylor Smith-Duffy
Defendant:
Dylan T. Conklin, J. Parker, City of Marietta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conklin v. Real Estate Enterprises, LLC et al
as 6:2021cv00104
Defendant:
KRISTI C. FULLER, ROYAL PROPERTIES, LLC, WILLIAM H. FULLER, JR and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. CONKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conklin v. Harley-Davidson Motor Company et al
as 3:2020cv01712
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson Motor Company and Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Conklin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conklin v. Foremost Insurance Group
as 7:2016cv06553
Plaintiff:
Bret T. Conklin
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others
DeNoma v. Kasich et al
as 1:2015cv00594
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeNoma
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Ted Strickland, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conklin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv01616
Plaintiff:
Craig T. Conklin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Conklin v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2015cv04808
Plaintiff:
John T Conklin
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc , AbbVie Products LLC and Abbott Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
