Cases 1 - 10 of 17
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
KRIS KANABLE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN, HIATT, D. THOMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Michael T Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
DAVIS v. OFFICER HARTLEY et al
as 4:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
JERRY T. DAVIS
Defendant:
OFFICER HARTLEY, LT. THOMAS, MAJ. O'LAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
MARQ HALL
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. CENTRAL OFFICE, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DUSHAN ZATECKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. ALLEN COUNTY JAIL CONFINEMENT OFFICER et al
as 1:2021cv01917
Defendant:
ALLEN COUNTY JAIL CONFINEMENT OFFICER, ZACHARY T DAVIS, KYLE S POORS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JAMES ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. DAVIS
as 2:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
T. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00375
Defendant:
FISCHER, CUPP, T. DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLING v. GRIFFITH et al
as 2:2020cv00240
Defendant:
F. LITTLEJOHN, BEDWELL, MRS. T. DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BRADLEY BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00191
Defendant:
B. TRIMBLE, FISCHER, HARDBALL and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. HANCOCK COUNTY, IN et al
as 1:2018cv02436
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY, IN, MCCORDSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFFS' DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
GENE T. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
