Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lewis v. Dixon et al
as 3:2026cv02407
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jerome Lewis
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, A Matthews, A. Johns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denmark v. Hofer et al
as 2:2026cv13162
Plaintiff:
David Scott Denmark
Defendant:
Nicholas Hofer, Perry Teolis, Anthony Giannola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sencial v. Cooley et al
as 1:2026cv00227
Plaintiff:
Steven Sencial
Defendant:
J. Cooley, Burl Cain, Laura Denmark and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Hatcher v. Quantasha Denmark, et al
as 26-11481
Plaintiff:
MARK EUGENE HATCHER
Defendant:
QUANTASHA DENMARK, LARRY B. STROUD, DULE W. ELDRIDGE and others
HATCHER v. DENMARK et al
as 4:2026cv00176
Plaintiff:
MARK EUGENE HATCHER
Defendant:
QUANTASHA DENMARK, WARDEN TAYLOR CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, LARRY B STROUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Denmark et al
as 8:2026cv01014
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Quantasha Denmark, Larry B. Stroud, Dule W. Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan Abair v. Neiman Marcus et al
as 5:2026cv01335
Plaintiff:
Ryan Abair
Defendant:
Neiman Marcus, 1stDibs, 24S and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
DENMARK v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv02170
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH DENMARK
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA LLC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simoneaux v. Reeves et al
as 1:2026cv00041
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Simoneaux
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Burl Cain, Gia McLeod and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralph McClain, Jr. v. Carlos Ruiz, III, et al
as 26-1215
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
LT. CARLOS RUIZ, III, C.O. C. WASHINGTON, C.O. DENMARK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
