Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Cooley v. (lnu) et al
as 5:2022cv03149
Plaintiff:
Tony Allen Cooley
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu), Ida Smootz, (fnu) Zimbicky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Scholl et al
as 2:2021cv02248
Defendant:
Michael Scholl, Martin Zummack, Jocelyn Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellous Cobb
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cobb v. Scholl et al
as 2:2021cv02247
Defendant:
Michael Scholl, Martin Zummack, Jocelyn Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellous Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pyziur v. Andeavor Logistics LP et al
as 1:2019cv05714
Plaintiff:
Max Pyziur
Defendant:
Sigmund L. Cornelius, Michael J. Hennigan, Ruth I. Dreessen and others
John Hardney v. USDC-SAC
as 18-72107
:
In re: JOHN FREDERICK HARDNEY
Petitioner:
JOHN FREDERICK HARDNEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
T. GRIFFITH, Correctional Officer, J. GOLD, Correctional Officer, M. RHOADES, Correctional Officer and others
GRIFFITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv03762
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. GRIFFITH, SR.
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardney v. Griffith et al
as 2:2017cv02462
Plaintiff:
John Hardney
Defendant:
T. Griffith, J. Gold, M. Rhoades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulette T. Griffith v. Victorias Secret Stores, LLC
as 2:2017cv06716
Defendant:
Does and Victorias Secret Stores, LLC
Plaintiff:
Paulette T. Griffith
Taylor et al v. Assurant Inc
as 2:2017cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Taylor and Katherine T Griffith
Defendant:
Assurant Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
