Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dyer v. State of California
as 3:2018cv06034
Respondent: State of California and Norman T. Kramer
Petitioner: Jewel E. Dyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hill v. Kramer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01178
Plaintiff: Cymeyon Hill
Defendant: T Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 17-2319
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant: CARL C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Defendant - Appellee: RONALD WILLEY, R. CARTER, E. HEDDINGER and others
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 15-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee: C. DANBERG, T. CARROLL, R. KEARNEY and others
Awan et al v. Kramer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv05092
Plaintiff: Abdul Qudoos Awan, Michael Shabbaz Awan and Sabrina Saleha Awan
Defendant: Judith T. Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kramer v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 3:2011cv00067
Plaintiff: Jerry T Kramer
Defendant: Correctional Medical Services , Indiana Department of Correction Westville Correctional Center and Venisha T Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00909
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Biggins v. Danberg et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00862
Plaintiff: James Arthur Biggins
Defendant: C. Danberg, T. Carroll, R. Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01861
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type: Contract None
Cornell Clemons v. Norman Kramer
as 08-56473
Petitioner - Appellant: CORNELL CLEMONS
Respondent - Appellee: NORMAN T. KRAMER, Acting Excecutive Director of Coalinga State Hospital

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?